The
				Math and Science Partnership (MSP) program’s Institute
				Partnerships: Teacher Institutes for the 21st century
				prepare school- and district-based intellectual leaders in
				mathematics or the sciences. With foci on subject-matter
				expertise and leadership development, the institutes deepen
				the content knowledge of experienced teachers, so that they
				can change their instructional practice, improve their students’
				achievement, and, over time, provide intellectual leadership in
				their own schools and with their own colleagues. 
				At
				Virginia Commonwealth
				University (VCU), the MSP Teacher
				Institute is preparing the first elementary
				mathematics specialists for a newly approved licensure in the
				Commonwealth of Virginia. Graduates of the Institute
				will receive a master’s degree in a program to be
				institutionalized at VCU, Norfolk State University, the
				University of Virginia and elsewhere in the Commonwealth. Data
				from the two mathematics courses in VCU’s 2005 Summer Institute
				document substantial and positive impacts on participants’
				knowledge of mathematics content, with differences in means that
				constitute very large effect sizes (as high as 1.27 on Geometry
				content knowledge, with scores greater than 0.8 considered to be
				a large effect), as well as on their perceived preparedness as
				classroom practitioners. 
				In
				the Rice University
				Mathematics Leadership Institute, teachers
				participating in the 2006 Summer
				Leadership Institute completed content courses
				in geometry and algebra. Changes in teachers’ knowledge of
				geometry were analyzed in a paired samples t-test using the
				scores of the 35 participants. The highest score possible on
				the geometry measure was 50. At the beginning of the
				institute,
				the teachers’ mean score on the Geometry pretest was 23.2,
				but after completion of the institute,
				their mean score on the same measure was 33.9. The change in
				score was statistically significant at the .0001 level. A
				similar approach was used to measure the change in teachers’
				knowledge of solutions for linear functions in algebra during the
				institute. The
				highest score possible on this measure was 40. At the
				beginning of the institute,
				the teachers’ mean on the algebra pretest was 13.6, but after
				summer participation, the teachers’ mean score on the same
				measure was 33.4. The change also was statistically
				significant at the .0001 level.
				Student
				outcomes are beginning to parallel growth in teacher
				knowledge. The Houston Independent School District Research
				and Accountability Department, for example, analyzed the impact
				of the teachers' participation in the Rice
				University Mathematics Leadership Institute. Teachers
				who participated in the 2005-2006 institute were compared to a
				group of non-institute Houston teachers who taught the same
				grade(s) at similar schools. The findings indicated that
				students of institute participants outperformed comparison
				students by 2.4 scale score points on the Texas Assessment of
				Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) and 0.82 National Curve Equivalents
				on the 2006 administration of the Stanford 10 mathematics
				assessment. In addition, institute teachers helped their
				lower performing students increase their minimum means scale
				score on the TAKS by 378 points.